Telling the truth 16%, Hiding something 53%, Mostly lying 28%, Not sure 3%
That little 16% is shrinking but those Die-Hard syncophantic faithful keep holding on. That to
really look at all the massive evidence against the official story would make them out to be fools
thus it is easier to continue in the ignorant bliss while the country is sold off and our
hundreds of years old liberties are taken.
The corporate controlled main stream media has been in
overdrive mode re-doubling their efforts to try to quash the 911 truth movement because the media has
been complicit in this massive coverup for the past 8+ years.
"We to this day don't know why NORAD told us what they told us,
It was just so far from the truth."
-- 9/11 Commission Chair Thomas H. Kean
"As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning
and molten steel was still running"
-- Leslie Robertson, the Chief Structural Engineer for the WTC
"If our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal
procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the twin towers
would still be standing, and thousands of dead Americans would
still be alive. That is treason!"
-- Retired Air Force Colonel Robert M. Bowman,
former director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space defense
"The exercises that went on that morning simulating the exact
kind of thing that was happening so confused the people in the
FAA and NORAD....that they didn't they didn't know what was
real and what was part of the exercise. I think the people who
planned and carried out those exercises, they're the ones that
should be the object of investigation."
-- Retired Air Force Colonel Robert M. Bowman,
former director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space defense
"Those conspiracies that are too incredible to be believed,
are by the same right, those which most often succeed."
-- Marshall McLuhan, philosopher
"In the size of the lie there is always contained a certain
factor of credibility, since the great masses of the people....
will more easily fall victim to a great lie than to a small one."
-- Hitler, Mein Kampf.
"If you tell a big enough Lie, and keep on repeating it, in the
end people will come to believe it."
-- Josef Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief
"Everybody knows that corruption thrives in secret places, and
avoids public places, and we believe it a fair presumption that
secrecy means impropriety."
-- Woodrow Wilson
"The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence
that it is not utterly absurd."
-- Bertrand Russell, British mathematician, philosopher
"He who conceals a useful truth is equally guilty with
the propagator of an injurious falsehood."
-- Augustine, Christian philosopher
"It can be held certain that information that is withheld or
suppressed contains truths that are detrimental to the persons
involved in the suppression."
-- J. Edgar Hoover
"The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a
conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."
-- J. Edgar Hoover
"The essence of the lie implies, in fact, that the liar is
actually in complete possession of the truth which he is
hiding."
-- Jean-Paul Sartre
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."
-- Aldous Huxley
"It can reasonably be extrapolated that if the entire public
were exposed to independent 9/11 research, about 90 percent
would support a new investigation of the events of that
fateful day."
-- Zogby Poll: Over 70 Million American Adults
Support New 9/11 Investigation
"The Republican Party has been reduced to one principle – its
own power. It protects the Bush regime from accountability and
covers up its lies and misdeeds. Under the myths and lies that
enshroud 9/11, the Democrats have collapsed as an opposition
party."
-- Paul Craig Roberts, Chief Economist under Reagon admin.
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed
citizens can change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing
that ever has."
-- Margaret Mead (1901-1978)
Charlie Sheen's Video Message to President Obama
Go Charlie! Now, it is everyone else's duty to wake up, verify the facts and see just how badly they have been lied to by the gov and the msm media all these years. Then demand real answers and accountability!
Twenty Minutes with the President,
Bibliography,
Meeting Request
The letter focuses around the fact that no less than 60 percent of the 9/11 commissioners have now publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell
the truth about 9/11 and that the
Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their
response to the attack and much more. These are the FACTS.
The following people question the government's version of 9/11, or the government's openness in providing information about the September 11 attacks.
9/11 COMMISSIONERS
The co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission
(Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton) said
that the CIA (and likely the White House) “obstructed our investigation”.
Former U.S. Republican Congressman
and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six
years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee
(Curt Weldon) has shown that the U.S.
tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about explosives
in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9/11
was an inside job
Director of the U.S. “Star
Wars” space defense program in both Republican and Democratic administrations,
who was a senior air force colonel who flew 101 combat missions (Col. Robert
Bowman) stated that 9/11
was an inside job. He also said:
U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and
NORAD Tac Director, decorated with the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star and the
Soldiers Medal (Capt. Daniel Davis) stated:
President of the U.S. Air Force Accident
Investigation Board, who also served as Pentagon Weapons Requirement Officer
and as a member of the Pentagon’s Quadrennial Defense Review, and who
was awarded Distinguished Flying Crosses for Heroism, four Air Medals, four
Meritorious Service Medals, and nine Aerial Achievement Medals (Lt. Col. Jeff
Latas) is a member of a group which doubts
the government’s version of 9/11
U.S. Air Force fighter pilot, former
instructor at the USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership
Program, with a 20-year Air Force career (Lt. Colonel Guy S. Razer) said
the following:
“I am 100% convinced that
the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by
treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government
….
Those of us in the military took
an oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States
against all enemies, foreign and domestic”. Just because we have retired
does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it
is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice,
no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer
to do it.
We owe it to those who have gone
before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in
Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully
executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation
and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate
definition of treason!”
“[T]here was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on television [when] they blow
up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these
explosions.”--Firefighter Richard Banaciski
“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a
building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory
“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you
hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic Daniel Rivera
The above quotations come from a collection of 9/11 oral histories that, although recorded by the
Fire Department of New York (FDNY) at the end of 2001, were publicly released only on August 12,
2005. Prior to that date, very few Americans knew the content of these accounts or even the fact
that they existed.
Those who cling to the official story of 9/11 are like the old people in Russia who cling to their idols and momentos of Communist rule - the photos of Stalin, or handkerchiefs emblazoned with the old Soviet symbol - long after the Russian leaders themselves say that free market capitalism is the way to go:
The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) - who led the 9/11 staff's inquiry - said
"At some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened". He also said
"I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described .... The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not spin. This is not true."
The Commission's co-chairs said that the CIA (and likely the White House) "obstructed our investigation"
It has all been part of a systematic and ongoing coverup. An extensive body of evidence consisting of statements by 503
firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians who witnessed the events in New York City on 9/11/2001 was
collected but never released to the public until the New York Times filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the city,
which sternly refused to release the transcripts. On August 12, 2005, the Times finally published the transcripts of the "oral histories."
All 503 testimonies here.. in PDF format,
Partial set of transcripts in text format
Note: Netctr.com does not advocate newfound theories such as that propounded by Morgan Reynolds, David Shayler, Judy Wood
and James Fetzer wherein they now state ridiculous nonsense claims about the 9/11 attacks -- space weapons, nukes, "TV fakery"
and even holograms, implying no planes hit the towers. There is a rash of disinfo articles and youtube videos (nose in, nose out,
blanking and a delay - this is just a play to baffle you with BS) trying to discredit the real truth of that event with that utter
nonsense. Do not be taken in by it, use your common sense.
A version of the source videos is at
Internet Archive: September 11 Television Archive
(ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, FOX, NBC 9-11, 12 and 13), however they have apparently been tampered with in that many of the critical news segments
have been filtered out and replaced with stock footage from that time frame. Especially from the morning where many people are telling about
bombs and explosions etc.. Unfortunately, the main stream news will not own up to this nor will they release the real footage. They are clearly
a part of the deception. What we have is what a few people released to the internet from their own taping of this event or what slipped out in
various 911 videos.
Never in American history have so many intelligent, often brilliant citizens engaged in a more penetrating,
astonishingly devoted investigation of a clearly-manipulated 'Reichstag' event such as 911. And their results are MORE
than sufficient to bring a trainload of charges against people within and without the highest levels of the US
government. There are tens of thousands of pages of data pointing to direct knowledge, complicity, foreknowledge and
treasonous conspiracy to convince ANY honestly open-minded American that there are the gravest indictations of
Government involvement, by a very few at the highest levels, in the tragedy of September 11.
Let's look at this like they would in a court case. If doubt can be shown as to any one part of the 'Official Story'
then that leaves the entire 'story' in doubt especially if there is any delay, obfuscation or apparent coverup in any way.
Indeed the entire 9/11 investigation and its resulting 585 page report follows that M.O.
Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld and Myers all said, "We didn't have any idea something like this could happen" and the FBI
produced the names of all the so-called hijackers later that same day. Seven months later we learn the Washington
kingpins were all running air defense drills of the exact same scenario that infamous day. Several months earlier
they had a drill of crashing a large plane into the Pentagon.
The official conspiracy theory is that a man in a cave in Asia pulled off 9/11, the "catalyzing event" that allows for
these big money-making wars. $1.4 billion to George W. Bush Senior and the Carlyle Group alone. How ever did Osama
keep our air defense grounded for 1 hour 51 minutes, an air defense second to none, which had performed swiftly and
carefully 67 separate times in the 12 months prior to 9/11 in surrounding and escorting wayward aircraft flying outside
their flight paths? 67 times from 9/11/2000 to 9/10/2001, but which failed so completely on 9/11. Osama didn't do
that.
And neither did Saddam. Bush and his gaggle of warmongers were responsible for that. The question is whether they
allowed it or orchestrated it. The entirety of our air defense was not out for coffee and donuts for 1 hour and 51
minutes that morning. The 9/11 Commission says our air defense was confused. I'll tell you where the confusion lies,
it's that the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, Philip Zelikow, was a former aide to Condeleeza Rice, and so
directed it to the conclusions it reached: Whitewash. No, not Whitewater: Whitewash. Ask any family members of the
victims of 9/11 how that commission refused to ask the questions the family members wanted answers to, but did'nt get.
Bush and Cheney Blocked the 9/11 Investigation. Initially Bush denied an investigation into the 9/11 attacks was
necessary. Bush later got Sen. Tom Daschle and the 9/11 Commission to limit the investigation's budget to $600,000; yet
Republicans spent $65,000,000 on whether President Clinton had sex in the oval office. Bush has never testified under
oath. His administration has refused to release thousands of documents, videos from security cameras, audio tapes and
pictures pertaining to 9/11.
"Fog of War could explain why some people were confused on the day of 9/11, but it could not explain why all of the after
action reports, accident investigations and public testimony by FAA and NORAD officials accounts of 9/11 was untrue."
Without Precedent, Aug.. 2006, book by Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton-chairman and member of the 9/11 commission.
What is "theory" and what is fact? In the absence of a full confession, this can only be decided by a preponderance of
evidence, and it would be silly to come to a conclusion on any matter without looking at all the evidence available.
This is only common sense, after all we went into Afghanistan and killed many thousands and displaced 3.4 Million people
to get osama however you should find it more than strange that the FBI does not even consider him wanted in regards to 9/11.
Check it out, go to fbi.gov and look under osama, realise what this means.
FBI says, “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11” The fake 2001 Osama bin Laden video tape
What we know is "al Qaeda" starring CIA asset Osama bin Laden (a.k.a. "Tim Osman") was a fully funded US and Saudi front
operation run out of Pakistan’s ISI, MI6 and CIA shells among others.
What we know is that up to several hundred 9/11 Israeli spies detected by DEA, FBI and CIA ops were caught (some with
box-cutters and explosives) as they tracked "hijackers" and US intelligence. (The 9/11 Israeli spy scandal was hushed up
out of Washington and Israel)
What we know is that the official 9/11 fairytale is an acknowledged COVER-UP that fewer than 15% of Americans believe
in. Kean and Hamilton have gone on record to state that "the [9/11] Commission was set up to fail" and "a a lot of
people have things to hide [on 9/11] … right up to Bill Clinton or George Bush."
Top CIA pros have said that:
"9/11 is a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke"
(Ray McGovern ex CIA)
"I am forced to conclude that 9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war"
(Robert David Steele ex CIA)
"…a monstrous series of lies… "a joke" … "Tragically, the entire course of U.S. foreign and domestic policies since that
date [9/11] has grown out of these almost certain falsehoods."
(CIA NIO officer William Christison)
"The final [9/11] report is ultimately a coverup."
(CIA Division Chief Melvin Goodman)
A COVER-UP at 9/11 is directly responsible for phony "war on terror" abroad and the destruction of human rights at home.
False 9/11 and a Crypto-Fascist "war on terror" state are one and the same. We also know that a COVER-UP at 9/11 is
naked proof of democracy MIA in America and around the globe.
Similarly, it is safe to assume some degree of guilt or complicity on the part of anyone who
lies about an event, or tries to hide, plant, or destroy any type of evidence. Indeed, the official story - 19 hijackers
conspire with a sickly man in a cave to take over 4 planes and crash them into 3 buildings and a field when none of them
could even fly a Cessna - is a conspiracy theory.
Theories arise from evidence which gradually emerges. After the government releases an explanation of a particular event, a
theory is only born because evidence exists to disprove their explanation, or at least call it into question.
There's nothing insane about it, unless you define sanity as believing whatever the government tells you. In light of
the fact that our government lies to us regularly, I would define believing everything they tell you as utter stupidity.
The real question is not why people theorize about conspiracies, but why people choose to believe the government's
version of events when it's obvious that they're lying. One reason is that most people never see the evidence because
our "news" industry hides it, and another reason is that the same news industry will quickly associate anyone who
questions the government with the people who see Elvis, Bigfoot, and UFO's.
But sadly, I think the main reason people choose to believe the government's version of events despite overwhelming
evidence to the contrary, is because it's easier, and safer. If you ignore most of the evidence, and accept as plausible
whatever ridiculous explanation the T.V. provides, your life remains simple, and you get to sit on your butt and watch
more T.V. If on the other hand, you just look at the preponderance of evidence contradicting the 'official story' and
realize you've been lied to, as a citizen in a democratic society, you're instantly burdened with being responsible for
doing something about it.
Every citizen of the United States has a civic duty to participate in their government, and keep themselves informed of its actions, or
government "of the people, by the people and for the people" isn't possible. You were warned that "eternal vigilance is
the price of freedom," but you chose to ignore your government, and believe whatever they told you, and because of
this, Americans have lost their freedoms. Although presidents and senators are public servants, unlike the dog catcher
and mailman, they wield a lot of power over people's lives, and that's why they have to be watched, and scrutinized.
Fire Engineering magazine is the 125-year-old paper-of-record of the fire engineering community. Bill Manning,
editor-in-chief, wrote an Editor’s Opinion in the January, 2002 edition. His editorial, $elling Out the Investigation,
pointed out that destruction of evidence – the hurried removal of rubble which should be examined by investigators – is
illegal. He also issued a “call to action”. To quote excerpts:
"For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold
for scrap. Crucial evidence that could answer many questions … is on the slow boat to China …"
"I have combed through our national standard for fire investigation, NFPA 921, but nowhere in it does one find an
exemption allowing the destruction of evidence for buildings over 10 stories tall."
"Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the ‘official investigation’ blessed by FEMA [Federal Emergency
Management Agency] and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a "half baked farce" [emphasis mine] that may
have already been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full
disclosure. Except for the marginal benefit obtained from a three-day, visual walk-through of evidence sites conducted
by ASCE investigation committee members – described by one close source as a ‘tourist trip’ – no one’s checking evidence
for anything."
"The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately."
"Firefighters, this is your call to action. …contact your representatives in Congress and officials in Washington and
help us correct this problem immediately."
A brief summary of some outstanding and unanswered points of fact surrounding the WTC collapses.
The engineers who designed the building designed it to withstand impact by planes and fire. To be able to take multiple
impacts from similarly sized aircraft as the 767--Like a window screen being poked with a pencil, it would do nothing to the
integrity of the structure.
Never before in history has a steel framed skyscraper been brought down from fire, yet on 9/11, by coincidence, three such buildings collapsed in under ten seconds each.
Building 7, which was not structurally damaged by aircraft, came down in a manner that matches the signature demolition
model, complete with triggering squibs (outward explosions of support structures preceding the falling mass), and
falling into its footprint. Slow motion video footage highlights these features.
How did the 9/11 Commission Official Report deal with the WTC7 collapse? They omitted it entirely. Not one mention of it.
Towers 1 and 2 also fell in a manner consistent with demolition, and had numerous visible squibs preceding the falling mass.
Bear in mind that a "tidy" and "safe" fall would not necessarily be the objective of individuals pulling off such a thing.
Rate of speed of the fall is near that of free-fall, which contradicts the pancake model in which a delay must be expected
due to conservation of momentum – one of the foundational Laws of Physics.
The fine powder into which the building was converted during the collapse is consistent with the demolition model and its
associated explosives. There would have been some pulverization in the pancake model, but not to the extent seen in this case.
NIST report 10/19/04: suggest that the steel was probably exposed to temperatures of only about 500F (250C), which is what one might expect
from a thermodynamic analysis of the situation. "most perimeter panels (157 of 160) saw no temperature above 250C". To soften steel for the
purposes of forging, normally temperatures need to be above 1100C. Newer NIST report contradicts original findings.
Google search: "saw no temperature above 250c" nist
Numerous eyewitnesses described hearing multiple explosions and popping not associated with the planes hitting the buildings.
WTC buildings 1,2 and 7 had undergone unannounced security evacuations in the days prior to Sept. 11. A concurrent power outage
disabled security cameras. Explosives-sniffing dogs were called off as part of that evacuation procedure. Marvin Bush, brother to the
President, was a principal in a security company, Securacom and now named Stratesec, for the WTC center, Dulles International Airport and United Airlines
It would only take 10 men ten trips to place the necessary explosives to bring the towers down by demolition.
The 911 Commission report says that there were no central support columns, which is a lie. The WTC had the most robust central support
columns, 47 massive steel columns, in the world at the time it was built, and was designed to be centrally supported.
Virtually all of the steel was quickly sold to scrap dealers, trucked away, and sent to Asia to be melted down. Thus the evidence
was destroyed which could have shown whether explosives had been used to slice them, contrary to laws governing removal of items from a crime scene..
The towers were basically condemned in 1989 because of Galvanic Corrosion between the outer wall parts having aluminum in them and not
electrically insulated properly when built. The cost then to bring them down was $5.6 Billion dollars.
Deposition on the problem,
Google search: galvanic corrosion wtc 1989
It is only corrosion on the aluminum panels on the exterior of the building. It had nothing to do with any support of the buildings
only the fascia of them. The buildings were primarily supported by the 47 central columns. They took those columns out in just a
very few places and with the support gone the outer walls were crushed thus throwing them outwards in 30 and 60 foot chucks. If the
outer walls gave way then just that part would have fallen leaving all the rest standing.
Mark Bingham, a passenger on Flight 93, is supposed to have called his mother and said, 'Hi, Mom, this is Mark Bingham!' His mother confirmed it
was his voice, but does anyone seriously believe that Mark Bingham would have used his last name in identifying himself to his mother? See
When Seeing and Hearing Isn't Believing - Voice morphing technology
The Northwoods Document irrefutably establishes
our government WOULD openly conspire to not only provoke and allow an attack (to further an already established military agenda)
...they'd actually manufacture the entire event.
Video of Norman Mineta stating before the 911 commission about Cheney in the bunker giving orders--stand down..
How could those towers have collapsed into a pile of rubble only a few stories high, when the core of each tower consisted of 47
massive steel central columns? You've got these 47 columns that go from the sub basements to the top. How could those all have
just collapsed into a pile of rubble?
The 9/11 Commission settled that easily. They said the core of each building consisted of a hollow steel shaft that just had
elevators and stairwells in it. That was easy . . . for them. No real explanation there because they could not explain it.
The columns were 36" x 16" and were 4" thick certified construction grade steel,
tapering in thickness to 1/4", and not size, toward the top. They were fitted in 5" thick bases, 54" x 22", going deep and firmly into the bedrock.
So you have 1100 feet of Steel which is a good conductor of heat. That means that if you heat a part, say 40' out of 1100', then the
heat would conduct or wick into the cooler part and cool off the heated area to an extent while the lower and thicker part would remain much cooler.
Now I said it was a good conductor and not a great conductor, you know this because the handle of your iron skillet does not
get anywhere near as hot as the pan. You can test this further by tieing or welding 2 skillets together by their handles then
heat one on the stove for an hour and note that the other is just warm.
Add to this the fact that the lower half of the 47 columns contained 4 times the mass of the upper
half, because of the tapering. This means that the vast majority of the lower half would remain cool to the touch thus leaving 550
feet of columns with nearly 100% of engineered strength.
Now we all know that the towers started collapsing from the upper part of the upper half and that they were in essence disintegrating
as they came down, throwing off the debris to the sides. And we know that the lower half had to support itself and the upper half so
by the time it got half way down there was this massively strong lower half with just over half the mass of the building to support.
Essentially, at that point, the lower half was only supporting half what it was 5 seconds before.
Theoretically it should have stopped collapsing at that point. This is the only logical result that should have happened.
At a very minimum you would be left with 47 columns sticking up in the air over 500 feet after all else crashes down.
What actually happened is beyond physical reality and is totally absurd.
So how do we explain the complete collapse? Actually we do not have to, it is their story that does not make sense. They have
not been able to explain this without changing their official story several times yet there is still no practical nor logical
explanation coming from them. Indeed there is no possible reason other than controlled demolition.
WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 are the only steel-structure buildings ever to have collapsed (allegedly) as a result of fire.
There are several cases of fires in other such buildings,
none of which collapsed.
A Fema report does indeed point out some extreme anomalies about melted and corroded steel beams containing sulphur and other mixtures
as follows. Yet NIST does not even cover this fact, they have stated that "most perimeter panels (157 of 160) saw no temperature above 250C."
It is clear that Nist and Fema do not agree with each other with their opposing views.
This is expounded upon by Steven E. Jones, Ph.D. who notes that there must have been Thermite used to cause this and the subsequent
collapse.
Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? PDF - Steven E. Jones, Ph.D.
"The temperature of the fire at the WTC was not unusual, and it
was most definitely not capable of melting steel."
-- Prof. Eagar, MIT, 2001
"Your gut reaction would be the jet fuel is what made the fire
so very intense, a lot of people figured that's what melted the
[WTC] steel. Indeed it did not, the steel did not melt."
-- Dr. Gayle, NIST, 2005
The photo at the right was taken 6 weeks after 9/11. How is this explained when MIT and NIST says it did not happen..
FEMA Report: Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation
and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the nearsurface
microstructure." ... "The thinning of the steel occurred by high temperature corrosion due to a
combination of oxidation and sulfidation." ... "The unusual thinning of the member is most likely
due to an attack of the steel by grain boundary penetration of sulfur forming sulfides that contain
both iron and copper." ... "A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur
formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel." ... "The severe corrosion and subsequent
erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the
sulfur has been identified. The rate of corrosion is also unknown. It is possible that this is the
result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings. It is also
possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel
structure. A detailed study into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed to determine what risk,
if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires."
http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf
The woman in the hole shows that the towers were Not an Inferno. The NIST report states that the Jet fuel was burned off after 10 minutes.
Thw firefighter audio tapes show that in one of the towers there were "only scattered pockets of fire and could be knocked down
with 2 hoses." Indeed they should not have come down which leads us back to Controlled Demolition on the Central Columns.
Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the "official investigation" blessed by FEMA and
run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a "half-baked farce" that may already have been
commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure.
Structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial
evidence that could answer many questions... The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately.Fire Engineering - 1/4/2002
"the president has said only a minority of the Commission can see a minority of the documents, and then they have
to clear what they are going to say to the rest of the Commission with the White House."
According to a 2004 Democracy Now interview, after the White House set the conditions for the examination of documents,
Cleland said, "If this decision stands, I, as a member of the commission, cannot look any American in the eye,
especially family members of victims, and say the commission had full access. This investigation is now compromised."
In the Press for Truth documentary, Cleland summarized his opinion, stating, "It's a scam."
-- Senator Max Cleland
WTC Building 7:
WTC 7 was the third major building that went down that day has not even been explained yet.
Actually it was, unsatisfactorily and they had to revise it when some glaring omissions were pointed out.
Now they do not even have a final report on it because obviously they know they don't have a plausible story to tell.
It is due in 2007 some time.... We'll see..
UPDATE: 8-21-2008 - NIST Finally releases the WTC 7 Final Report
They have completely reversed their stance on both "Diesel fuel fires" and "Falling debris scooped out 25% of the building" caused the collapse.
Now it is a completely new and unknown phenomenon that there was Thermal expansion from fires on floor 12 caused the beams on the east side
of the building to push the girder to the west, breaking its connection to column 79 and pushing it off its seat on that column. This then
allowed that floor, on that side and area to fall, causing the lower floors to fall which then left column 79 not laterally supported so then it failed
and caused a progressive collapse of the entire building.
This "final report" took 5 years, was extended 3 years, $20 Million dollars and thousands of hours of 'scientist' labor to fake.
To be continued...
FEMA's recent excuse (prior to 8-21-2008): "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse [“official theory”]
remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis
[fire/damage-caused collapse] has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses
are needed to resolve this issue."
FEMA is not an investigative agency, but it was entrusted with the sole responsibility for investigating the collapses.
It began to coordinate the destruction of the evidence almost immediately. The structural steel was quickly removed and
loaded on ships for transport to blast furnaces in India and China.
WTC 7 was not hit by a plane that day so there is no "plane knocked the fireproofing off" excuse. As a matter
of fact, it is the only steel framed building to be brought down by fire alone in the history of the world.
And so it's obviously the biggest embarrassment for the government, so the 9/11 Commission handled Building 7
by simply omitting it from the report.
The 47-story, WTC-7 burst into flame, several suspicious, small haphazard fires that raged hours through several key floors long after
the twin towers fell. They should have been extinguished in minutes by the buildings fire system. Besides government agencies DOD, CIA,
SS, IRS and Giuliani's "Command HQ," it also was home to the
Security and Exchange Commission. Several of the floors housed records pertaining to multi-billion dollar investigations.
The Los Angeles Times reported on September 17, 2001 that an estimated 3,000 to 4,000 cases were destroyed including those
for Worldcom and Enron, the latter of which swindled California out of $70 Billion Dollars in a power shortage scam.
They included SEC's major inquiry into the manner in which investment banks divided up hot shares of initial
public offerings (IPOs) during the high-tech boom of the late 90's. Remember this important fact: By end of summer 2001
was when all Hell was breaking loose at Enron, the bulk of all Enron's documents filed with the SEC likely went up in smoke
when that building was deliberately blown. By destroying the building, the fire and subsequent collapse destroyed the records
forever and meant a huge net savings for CEOs and corporations being investigated.
A cursory insight into professional building demolition tells us that experts are required to spend weeks and months
planning the demolition of any building, ensuring that the explosives are placed in exactly the right spots, that the
collapse will not impact surrounding buildings, and that a myriad of sufficient safety procedures are followed.
To imagine that demolition experts could rig such a huge building amidst the chaos of the day, unsure of whether further
attacks were coming, in a matter of hours and bring the building down neatly in its own footprint without afflicting
major damage to adjacent buildings is beyond belief.
Even if one entertains the notion that this is within the realm of possibility, the fact is that the federal government,
FEMA and NIST and Silverstein Properties are all knowingly lying in claiming that the building collapsed by accident as
a result of burning debris from the twin towers.
Now it is established that they lied about Building 7, how can we trust their often changing explanations of the
collapse of the twin towers, especially considering the dozens and dozens of eyewitnesses who have gone on the record to
report the fact that explosives were seen and heard on all levels of both towers, including underground?
We are being asked to put our faith in either the federal government, who deliberately lied about 9/11 in the very days
after the attack in telling emergency workers and firemen that the toxic air was safe to breathe, or the emergency
workers and other rescue heroes who risked their lives and are still suffering the consequences of their actions.
This testimony demands an immediate grand jury inquiry into both monolithic insurance fraud, potential manslaughter, and
a complete re-appraisal and re-investigation into everything else that happened on 9/11 in an effort to discover what
else the government lied about concerning the events of that day and its aftermath.
NYPD Officer Heard Building 7 Bombs -
"The whole time you're hearing boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. I think I know an explosion when I hear it"
It is important to stress that everywhere we turn there are statements from firemen, NYPD officials, EMT's and others
who were involved in the rescue efforts attesting to the fact that Building 7 was brought down deliberately and that
bombs were heard in all three buildings. During the five year anniversary protests at ground zero, a plethora of firemen
and police echoed similar sentiments but few are prepared to go on the record. However, the fact that they and many of
their friends are now dying in large numbers as a result of government deception is encouraging more to come forward.
In an April 19 speech delivered to the Common wealth Club in San Francisco, Mueller said that the purported hijackers,
in his words, “left no paper trial.” The FBI director stated flatly, "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a
single piece of paper—either here in the United States or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in
Afghanistan and elsewhere—that mentioned any aspect of the Sept. 11 plot." In describing Mueller’s evidence fiasco, Los
Angeles Times reporters Erich Lichtblau and Josh Meyer, whose article was reprinted in The Washington Post on April 30,
note that: Law enforcement officials say that while they have been able to reconstruct the movements of the hijackers
before the attacks—all legal except for a few speeding tickets—they have found no evidence of their actual plotting.
In process. . . As if the above is not enough to put all the perps in prison..
The Pentagon:
Click image for the High-Res original.
It is recommended that everyone save this to your system. I believe this image is a smoking gun and is disappearing from the net.
It was saved from the fema web site in the days just after 911. The photograph was taken prior to the collapse of that section of
the Pentagon which happened at about 20 - 35 minutes after impact.
Not a one of the web sites or 'media' orgs that support the
official story of flight 77 will ever show you this image, rather they only show the image after that section collapsed.
The talking heads keep repeating that it was a 90 foot hole or as in the latest
Times 'hit piece' or
here -- that it was a 75 foot hole
that was left by the plane! Do you see a 75/90' hole? This is their fallacy where you can see that they are lying.
In "The path to 9/11" by ABC the very first image of the Pentagon was one of after it collapsed. This is a case of deliberate deception
by the main stream media. Can you say COVERUP?
In the video
The Debate: Loose Change Vs. Popular Mechanics
David Dunbar speaking for popular mechinics states that the above image is "a misleading picture, that gash is about 90 feet across" at 24:30 into the debate.
Cold War veteran, Maj. General Albert Stubblebine, refutes Pentagon's official story of "passenger plane" striking the Pentagon on September 11th 2001. Pilots for 9/11 Truth - American 77 (Pentagon) @ pilotsfor911truth.org
What they will always show you is an image similar to that at the right.
The section that collapsed is roughly 65' across. The windows are supposedly 5' wide by 7' tall, measuring this
out in photoshop shows the entry hole to be roughly 16' wide. The 757 has a wingspan of 124 feet and tail height of 44 feet
with a takeoff weight of 100 tons. Plane specs at
airliners.net,
jet photos here. How did a 757 fit
through that? It is just large enough for the main body but above it there is no damage where the tail would have hit and to the
sides there appears to be too little damage where the wings and engines would have hit if it were a 757. The wings were roughly
25-30 tons each and moving at the estimated 400+ to 540 mph would make for a very large amount of kinetic energy. There would have been
2 engines, 9' in diameter and weighing 10,000 lbs each but they only found 1 turbo fan impeller which was about 2-3' in diameter.
The facade of the Pentagon is made of limestone which is very soft and brittle, it would be easily crushed against the
concrete behind it and fall to the ground as seen to the right of the hole. Notice the facade is mostly still intact.
Notice the windows above and the one at the left of the hole are still intact with foam on them. That window at the left side of
the hole must be one of them "Penta-Glass" windows. It surely should not be there just hanging like that.
Where the wings attach to the main body of the plane it is highly reinforced and is called the "wing root". It is extremely strong
and many times stronger than just the ability to hold the wings and heavy weight of the engines at standstill or the weight of the
plane in flight. It must be able to hold up under any expected turbulance encountered. There is also the leverage factor here
wherein the wings are about 56' long each giving a center of gravity of about 18' and the thickness of the wing is 4.38', at its thickest,
so it would have a factor of about 4.11. This means that the wing root must be another 4 times stronger.
It is a sure thing that the window to the left would not even be close to surviving if a 757 struck.
Photo of window and frame assembly.
Transcript on 9-15-01 of damage tour.
Briefing slides of damage.
According to the Dept. of Defence, the wings "telescoped" into the body of the aircraft and followed it in. The wings of
a 757 are swept back at an angle of 29 degrees. With the angle of entry, 48-50 degrees, and if it were a 757 and there
were sufficient column reinforcement in the building then the left wing would have sheared off and mostly traveled down
the side of the building. It is simple physics and common sense. The wing on the left could not possibly have "followed
the plane into the building" even if it were made of rubber, the 'moment of inertia' vs the 'elasticity' of the
materials the wing is composed of is just too high at the point of the wing-root. Conversely, if the columns were weak
then there would be a much larger hole similar to what was left in the WTC buildings. The wing on the right is a
different story, it would have started folding in as the tip hit the building. Additionally when the right wing hit the
building that would have applied an angular momentum to the entire plane, causing it to enter in a sliding/sideways
motion possibly enough to cause a shearing off of the rear half of the main body section. This is all assuming that the
column on the left side of the hole was "infinitely" strong, which it is not. In any case the damage to the fragile
limestone facade would have been much more extensive and there would be 30,000+ pounds of left wing material outside
the pentagon, which there was not.
The area of the Pentagon that was hit, housed the "Office of Naval Intelligence" which had many on going investigations into things such as
the JFK assassination and particularly monetary malfeasance or waste of taxpayer dollars at the Pentagon. Just the day before
on September 10, 2001 Donald Rumsfeld was speaking to Congress about a
"Missing $2.3 Trillion Dollars"
that cannot be accounted for. The actual amount is over $3.4 Trillion, see Rep. Cynthia McKinney confront
Rumsfeld about it in the House Armed Services Committee.
Cynthia Mckinney Grills Rumsfeld
over missing Pentagon Trillions, Dyncorp Sex Slave Trade and War Games on 9/11 - CSPAN.
Many more Trillions missing articles.
It would have been "handy" to stomp out that investigation by literally destroying it.
Following Zakheim and Pentagon trillions to Israel and 9-11
After the Pentagon attack, the video cameras and tapes at a nearby CITGO, the Sheraton Hotel along I-395 and Virginia
DOT cameras were all confiscated by the FBI and they have yet to disclose any of the contents that were recorded by
those cameras. I have read about dozens of traffic camera videos. What about those 5 frames from the guard
camera, where are the rest of the frames? Walmart has dozens of cameras on their buildings, the Pentagon would have at
least that many, where are those? Why would they not release all the videos and prove this pentagon thing once and for all?
It is now confirmed that there were 86 cameras total covering the Pentagon, including the 2 videos that were just recently
released. The government claims all remaining 84 cameras either didn't capture the impact or that tape in the cameras was
mysteriously empty and yet returned as normal to film the cleanup operations. If the government is telling the truth in
saying that the tapes show nothing of interest then what are they trying to hide by not releasing them?
Our Analysis of the new release of the Pentagon videos.
Those cameras would have recorded what came in to hit the Pentagon and if viewed by the public, all the
world would know that it was not a Boeing 757, American Airlines Flight 77, as we were told. All the world would know
that Bush's assertion is in fact a huge lie.
The Pentagon is the world's best defended site, within a couple miles of Andrews Air Force Base. The military claims
there were no fighter squadrons on alert, which Griffin says is ridiculous.
The United States military boasts of the best radar system anywhere — they claim they don't miss anything in North
American airspace, and the system is designed to track multiple targets simultaneously (as it would need to if America
were under attack from a foreign air force or ICBM missile attack). So how'd they miss a commercial airliner headed right
for the Pentagon?
The Pentagon is equipped with antiaircraft missile batteries that attacks anything within range that's not equipped with
a US military transponder. Which means either the missile batteries were deactivated on 9/11 or so called 'Flight 77' had a US
military transponder. Neither of which is a promising explanation.
What I see so clearly is that with all the lies the gov has made in the past 5
years just how can anything from them, be believed including and especially the Pentagon story.
"It can be held certain that information that is withheld or suppressed contains truths that are detrimental to the
persons involved in the suppression."
-- J. Edgar Hoover
The Pentagon claims The Engines, Wings and Flight Recorder were Vaporized... They also claim The Passenger Body Parts
were not Vaporized, and were Identified! Furthermore
Autopsies Show There Were No Arabs On Flight 77 and
here.
They Claim that the nose punched through 6 Reinforced walls - 9 feet of Concrete but
the heavier and denser 10,000 lb. engines didn't punch through even one. The recent Popular Mechanics story changes this to claim that it was
the landing gear that punched through the 6 walls. Does that make sense?
Downloadable: 5 Books about what really happened on 9/11 -
David Kay - The Big Lie, 911 and Government Complicity in Mass Murder (2005),
Webster Tarpley - 911 Synthetic Terror (2004),
David Ray Griffin - The New Pearl Harbor. Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 911 (2004),
Michael C. Ruppert - Crossing the Rubicon (2004),
Rodney Stich - Blowback 911 And Cover-Ups (2005)
Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? PDF - Steven E. Jones, Ph.D.
Steven E. Jones BYU Prof. -
"In writing this paper, I call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought
down, not just by damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned explosives. I consider the official FEMA,
NIST, and 9-11 Commission reports that fires plus damage alone caused complete collapses of all three buildings. And I
present evidence for the explosive-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested by the available data, testable and
falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded by the US government."
Silverstein, FDNY Decided to 'Pull WTC 7': An In-Depth Analysis.
This is important because it takes weeks to rig a building for demolition therefore it was rigged before 9/11. What about WTC 1 and 2?
Yet FEMA and 9/11 Commission say, "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time."
Moreover, FDNY does not do implosions according to their rules, regulations, and training.
Wargames Were Cover For the Operational Execution of 9/11.
There were at least 5 different wargames taking place on the morning of 9/11, fema was already in-place, there were hundreds of "Decoy"
blips on the radar screens, Cheney: "The orders still stand" as Flight 77 approaches the Pentagon with no action taken to defend it.
Read all the articles from this link - you will then understand..
Rumsfeld made the
following comment in a
Parade magazine interview on Oct 12, 01.
"Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to
damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center." Freudian slip?
The Northwoods document (available at the National Security Archive) proves beyond any shadow of doubt that our government
has openly conspired to COMPLETELY MANUFACTURE a pretext for war. It also gives us an idea of how far the ruling elite are
willing to go in order to deceive the American people; how far they are willing to go in order to get what they want. Operation Northwoods: Us Planned Fake Terror Attacks On Citizens <===
9/11: A Closer Look Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil - Michael C. Ruppert & Catherine Austin Fitts Crossing the Rubicon, Simplifying the case against Dick Cheney Well worth a read Condoleeza Rice Warned Willie Brown Not To Fly On 9/11 Stanley Hilton's 9/11 Suit Dismissed
"The judge's ruling was based on the "Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity." In other words, the suit was not dismissed because
of lack of evidence, but rather because the judge reasoned that U.S. Citizens do not have the right to hold a sitting President accountable
for anything, even if the charges include premeditated mass murder and premeditated acts of high treason." Clinton can get impeached and investigated for
a dress stain yet no one can truly investigate Bush because he is 'sitting'. Outrageous
Note: You may need "Codecs" installed into your computer to view downloaded videos. They can be obtained through
Codecs with links and instructions.
"In America, the criminally insane rule and the rest of us,
or the vast majority of the rest of us, either do not care,
do not know, or are distracted and properly brainwashed
into acquiescence."
-- Kurt Nimmo
"The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed
than he who reads them; inasmuch as he who knows nothing is
nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods
and errors."
-- Thomas Jefferson
"There is a chance for the President of the United States to use
the disaster . . . to carry out what his father - a phrase his
father used I think only once, and it hasn't been used since
- and that is a New World Order."
-- Gary Hart, at a CFR meeting September 14, 2001
What they will always show you is an image similar to that at the right.
The section that collapsed is roughly 65' across. The windows are supposedly 5' wide by 7' tall, measuring this
out in photoshop shows the entry hole to be roughly 16' wide. The 757 has a wingspan of 124 feet and tail height of 44 feet
with a takeoff weight of 100 tons. Plane specs at
airliners.net,
jet photos here. How did a 757 fit
through that? It is just large enough for the main body but above it there is no damage where the tail would have hit and to the
sides there appears to be too little damage where the wings and engines would have hit if it were a 757. The wings were roughly
25-30 tons each and moving at the estimated 400+ to 540 mph would make for a very large amount of kinetic energy. There would have been
2 engines, 9' in diameter and weighing 10,000 lbs each but they only found 1 turbo fan impeller which was about 2-3' in diameter.
