911 Exposed - 9/11 Truth

CNN Poll - 83% Believe Government Coverup on 9/11

Scientific Poll: 81% Reject Official 9/11 Story:

Telling the truth 16%, Hiding something 53%, Mostly lying 28%, Not sure 3%

That little 16% is shrinking but those Die-Hard syncophantic faithful keep holding on. That to really look at all the massive evidence against the official story would make them out to be fools thus it is easier to continue in the ignorant bliss while the country is sold off and our hundreds of years old liberties are taken. The corporate controlled main stream media has been in overdrive mode re-doubling their efforts to try to quash the 911 truth movement because the media has been complicit in this massive coverup for the past 8+ years.

Loose Change Final Cut 9/11
Loose Change Final Cut 9/11 - 2:10, Website
The most downloaded series in internet history

9/11 Mysteries
9/11 Mysteries - 1:31, Website

Video - Able Danger 9/11 Coverup
Video - Mainstream Media vs 9/11 Truth

Many More Documentaries of Critical Importance

"We to this day don't know why NORAD told us what they told us,
 It was just so far from the truth."
 -- 9/11 Commission Chair Thomas H. Kean
"As of 21 days after the attack, the fires were still burning
 and molten steel was still running" 
 -- Leslie Robertson, the Chief Structural Engineer for the WTC

"If our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal
 procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the twin towers
 would still be standing, and thousands of dead Americans would
 still be alive. That is treason!"
 -- Retired Air Force Colonel Robert M. Bowman,
    former director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space defense

"The exercises that went on that morning simulating the exact
 kind of thing that was happening so confused the people in the
 FAA and NORAD....that they didn't they didn't know what was
 real and what was part of the exercise. I think the people who
 planned and carried out those exercises, they're the ones that
 should be the object of investigation."
 -- Retired Air Force Colonel Robert M. Bowman,
    former director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space defense

"Those conspiracies that are too incredible to be believed,
 are by the same right, those which most often succeed."
 -- Marshall McLuhan, philosopher

"In the size of the lie there is always contained a certain
 factor of credibility, since the great masses of the people....
 will more easily fall victim to a great lie than to a small one."
 -- Hitler, Mein Kampf.

"If you tell a big enough Lie, and keep on repeating it, in the 
 end people will come to believe it."
 -- Josef Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief

"Everybody knows that corruption thrives in secret places, and
 avoids public places, and we believe it a fair presumption that
 secrecy means impropriety."
 -- Woodrow Wilson

"The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence
 that it is not utterly absurd."
 -- Bertrand Russell, British mathematician, philosopher

"He who conceals a useful truth is equally guilty with
 the propagator of an injurious falsehood."
 -- Augustine, Christian philosopher

"It can be held certain that information that is withheld or
 suppressed contains truths that are detrimental to the persons
 involved in the suppression."
 -- J. Edgar Hoover

"The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a
 conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."
 -- J. Edgar Hoover

"The essence of the lie implies, in fact, that the liar is
 actually in complete possession of the truth which he is
 -- Jean-Paul Sartre

"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored."
 -- Aldous Huxley

"It can reasonably be extrapolated that if the entire public
 were exposed to independent 9/11 research, about 90 percent
 would support a new investigation of the events of that
 fateful day."
 -- Zogby Poll: Over 70 Million American Adults
    Support New 9/11 Investigation

"The Republican Party has been reduced to one principle – its
 own power. It protects the Bush regime from accountability and
 covers up its lies and misdeeds. Under the myths and lies that
 enshroud 9/11, the Democrats have collapsed as an opposition
 -- Paul Craig Roberts, Chief Economist under Reagon admin.

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed
 citizens can change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing
 that ever has."
 -- Margaret Mead (1901-1978)

Charlie Sheen's Video Message to President Obama
Go Charlie! Now, it is everyone else's duty to wake up, verify the facts and see just how badly they have been lied to by the gov and the msm media all these years. Then demand real answers and accountability! Twenty Minutes with the President, Bibliography, Meeting Request

The letter focuses around the fact that no less than 60 percent of the 9/11 commissioners have now publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11 and that the Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack and much more. These are the FACTS.

The following people question the government's version of 9/11, or the government's openness in providing information about the September 11 attacks.


The co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission (Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton) said that the CIA (and likely the White House) “obstructed our investigation”.

The co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission also said that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements, yet didn’t bother to tell the American people (free subscription required).

Indeed, the co-chairs of the Commission now admit that the Commission largely operated based upon political considerations.

9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says “I don’t believe for a minute we got everything right”, that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, that the 9/11 debate should continue, and that the 9/11 Commission report was only “the first draft” of history.

9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .”

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”

Former 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”.

9/11 Commissioner John Lehman said that “We purposely put together a staff that had - in a way - conflicts of interest“.

The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry, said “at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened... I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin.”


According to the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham, a U.S. government informant was the landlord to two of the hijackers for over a year (but the White House refused to let the 9/11 inquiry interview him).

Current U.S. Senator (Patrick Leahy) states “The two questions that the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush’s watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it to happen?”

Current Republican Congressman (Ron Paul) calls for a new 9/11 investigation and states that “we see the [9/11] investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on”

Current Democratic Congressman (Dennis Kucinich) hints that we aren’t being told the truth about 9/11

Former Democratic Senator (Mike Gravel) states that he supports a new 9/11 investigation and that we don’t know the truth about 9/11

Former Republican Senator (Lincoln Chaffee) endorses a new 9/11 investigation

Former U.S. Democratic Congressman (Dan Hamburg) says that the U.S. government “assisted” in the 9/11 attacks, stating that “I think there was a lot of help from the inside”

Former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee (Curt Weldon) has shown that the U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job


Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan (Col. Ronald D. Ray) said that the official story of 9/11 is “the dog that doesn’t hunt” (bio)

Director of the U.S. “Star Wars” space defense program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, who was a senior air force colonel who flew 101 combat missions (Col. Robert Bowman) stated that 9/11 was an inside job. He also said:

If our government had merely [done] nothing, and I say that as an old interceptor pilot-I know the drill, I know what it takes, I know how long it takes, I know what the procedures are, I know what they were, and I know what they’ve changed them to-if our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures to happen on that morning of 9/11, the Twin Towers would still be standing and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive. [T]hat is treason!

U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director, decorated with the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal (Capt. Daniel Davis) stated:

“there is no way that an aircraft . . . would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control … Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a ‘conspiracy Theory’ does not change the truth. It seems, ‘Something is rotten in the State.’ “

President of the U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation Board, who also served as Pentagon Weapons Requirement Officer and as a member of the Pentagon’s Quadrennial Defense Review, and who was awarded Distinguished Flying Crosses for Heroism, four Air Medals, four Meritorious Service Medals, and nine Aerial Achievement Medals (Lt. Col. Jeff Latas) is a member of a group which doubts the government’s version of 9/11

U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe, decorated with the Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Purple Heart (General Wesley Clark) said “We’ve never finished the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence information it had. The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I’ve seen that for a long time.”

Air Force Colonel and key Pentagon official (Lt. Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski) finds various aspects of 9/11 suspicious

Lieutenant colonel, 24-year Air Force career, Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs at the Defense Language Institute (Lt. Colonel Steve Butler) said “Of course Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism.”

Two-Star general (Major General Albert Stubbelbine) questions the attack on the Pentagon

U.S. Air Force fighter pilot, former instructor at the USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership Program, with a 20-year Air Force career (Lt. Colonel Guy S. Razer) said the following:

“I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government ….

Those of us in the military took an oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic”. Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it.

We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!”

Much much more at the source:

“[T]here was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”--Firefighter Richard Banaciski

“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory

“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic Daniel Rivera

The above quotations come from a collection of 9/11 oral histories that, although recorded by the Fire Department of New York (FDNY) at the end of 2001, were publicly released only on August 12, 2005. Prior to that date, very few Americans knew the content of these accounts or even the fact that they existed.

Those who cling to the official story of 9/11 are like the old people in Russia who cling to their idols and momentos of Communist rule - the photos of Stalin, or handkerchiefs emblazoned with the old Soviet symbol - long after the Russian leaders themselves say that free market capitalism is the way to go:

  • The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) - who led the 9/11 staff's inquiry - said "At some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened". He also said "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described .... The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not spin. This is not true."
  • The Commission's co-chairs said that the CIA (and likely the White House) "obstructed our investigation"
  • 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: "It is a national scandal"; "This investigation is now compromised"; and "One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up"

    9/11 The Ultimate Con - full Documentary - 1:54

    9/11 Blueprint for Truth presented by Architect Richard Gage, AIA - 1:59

    Fabled Enemies - Who is the Real Enemy? - 1:42

    911 False Flag - German Documentary - 1:13 - Loose Change Final Cut - 2:09

    Core Of Corruption: In The Shadows - 2:28

    It has all been part of a systematic and ongoing coverup. An extensive body of evidence consisting of statements by 503 firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians who witnessed the events in New York City on 9/11/2001 was collected but never released to the public until the New York Times filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the city, which sternly refused to release the transcripts. On August 12, 2005, the Times finally published the transcripts of the "oral histories."
    All 503 testimonies here.. in PDF format, Partial set of transcripts in text format

      Note: does not advocate newfound theories such as that propounded by Morgan Reynolds, David Shayler, Judy Wood and James Fetzer wherein they now state ridiculous nonsense claims about the 9/11 attacks -- space weapons, nukes, "TV fakery" and even holograms, implying no planes hit the towers. There is a rash of disinfo articles and youtube videos (nose in, nose out, blanking and a delay - this is just a play to baffle you with BS) trying to discredit the real truth of that event with that utter nonsense. Do not be taken in by it, use your common sense.

      A version of the source videos is at Internet Archive: September 11 Television Archive (ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, FOX, NBC 9-11, 12 and 13), however they have apparently been tampered with in that many of the critical news segments have been filtered out and replaced with stock footage from that time frame. Especially from the morning where many people are telling about bombs and explosions etc.. Unfortunately, the main stream news will not own up to this nor will they release the real footage. They are clearly a part of the deception. What we have is what a few people released to the internet from their own taping of this event or what slipped out in various 911 videos.

    Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth! - Over 700 Professional Engineers | Paying Attention to 9/11 Related Alternative News - Real Guts to Make a Change in Public Awareness ::::: The 9/11 Truth Movement
    Pilots for 9/11 Truth
    U.S. Military Officers for 9/11 Truth
    Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice
    Fire Fighters For 9-11 Truth
    Fire Fighters For 9-11 Truth: Summary of Evidence of Controlled Demolition
    Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report - Including 140+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials, 530+ Engineers and Architects, 120+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals, 290+ Professors Question 9/11, 210+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members and 160+ Artists, Entertainers, and Media Professionals.
    Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth
    Journal of 9/11 Studies
    Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
    Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth
    Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth
    Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven
    Veterans for 9/11 Truth

    Never in American history have so many intelligent, often brilliant citizens engaged in a more penetrating, astonishingly devoted investigation of a clearly-manipulated 'Reichstag' event such as 911. And their results are MORE than sufficient to bring a trainload of charges against people within and without the highest levels of the US government. There are tens of thousands of pages of data pointing to direct knowledge, complicity, foreknowledge and treasonous conspiracy to convince ANY honestly open-minded American that there are the gravest indictations of Government involvement, by a very few at the highest levels, in the tragedy of September 11.

    Let's look at this like they would in a court case. If doubt can be shown as to any one part of the 'Official Story' then that leaves the entire 'story' in doubt especially if there is any delay, obfuscation or apparent coverup in any way. Indeed the entire 9/11 investigation and its resulting 585 page report follows that M.O.

    Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld and Myers all said, "We didn't have any idea something like this could happen" and the FBI produced the names of all the so-called hijackers later that same day. Seven months later we learn the Washington kingpins were all running air defense drills of the exact same scenario that infamous day. Several months earlier they had a drill of crashing a large plane into the Pentagon.

    The official conspiracy theory is that a man in a cave in Asia pulled off 9/11, the "catalyzing event" that allows for these big money-making wars. $1.4 billion to George W. Bush Senior and the Carlyle Group alone. How ever did Osama keep our air defense grounded for 1 hour 51 minutes, an air defense second to none, which had performed swiftly and carefully 67 separate times in the 12 months prior to 9/11 in surrounding and escorting wayward aircraft flying outside their flight paths? 67 times from 9/11/2000 to 9/10/2001, but which failed so completely on 9/11. Osama didn't do that.

    And neither did Saddam. Bush and his gaggle of warmongers were responsible for that. The question is whether they allowed it or orchestrated it. The entirety of our air defense was not out for coffee and donuts for 1 hour and 51 minutes that morning. The 9/11 Commission says our air defense was confused. I'll tell you where the confusion lies, it's that the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, Philip Zelikow, was a former aide to Condeleeza Rice, and so directed it to the conclusions it reached: Whitewash. No, not Whitewater: Whitewash. Ask any family members of the victims of 9/11 how that commission refused to ask the questions the family members wanted answers to, but did'nt get.

    Bush and Cheney Blocked the 9/11 Investigation. Initially Bush denied an investigation into the 9/11 attacks was necessary. Bush later got Sen. Tom Daschle and the 9/11 Commission to limit the investigation's budget to $600,000; yet Republicans spent $65,000,000 on whether President Clinton had sex in the oval office. Bush has never testified under oath. His administration has refused to release thousands of documents, videos from security cameras, audio tapes and pictures pertaining to 9/11.

    "Fog of War could explain why some people were confused on the day of 9/11, but it could not explain why all of the after action reports, accident investigations and public testimony by FAA and NORAD officials accounts of 9/11 was untrue." Without Precedent, Aug.. 2006, book by Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton-chairman and member of the 9/11 commission.

    What is "theory" and what is fact? In the absence of a full confession, this can only be decided by a preponderance of evidence, and it would be silly to come to a conclusion on any matter without looking at all the evidence available. This is only common sense, after all we went into Afghanistan and killed many thousands and displaced 3.4 Million people to get osama however you should find it more than strange that the FBI does not even consider him wanted in regards to 9/11. Check it out, go to and look under osama, realise what this means. FBI says, “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11”
    The fake 2001 Osama bin Laden video tape

    What we know is "al Qaeda" starring CIA asset Osama bin Laden (a.k.a. "Tim Osman") was a fully funded US and Saudi front operation run out of Pakistan’s ISI, MI6 and CIA shells among others.

    What we know is that up to several hundred 9/11 Israeli spies detected by DEA, FBI and CIA ops were caught (some with box-cutters and explosives) as they tracked "hijackers" and US intelligence. (The 9/11 Israeli spy scandal was hushed up out of Washington and Israel)

    What we know is that the official 9/11 fairytale is an acknowledged COVER-UP that fewer than 15% of Americans believe in. Kean and Hamilton have gone on record to state that "the [9/11] Commission was set up to fail" and "a a lot of people have things to hide [on 9/11] … right up to Bill Clinton or George Bush."

    Top CIA pros have said that:

    • "9/11 is a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke" (Ray McGovern ex CIA)

    • "I am forced to conclude that 9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war" (Robert David Steele ex CIA)

    • "…a monstrous series of lies… "a joke" … "Tragically, the entire course of U.S. foreign and domestic policies since that date [9/11] has grown out of these almost certain falsehoods." (CIA NIO officer William Christison)

    • "The final [9/11] report is ultimately a coverup." (CIA Division Chief Melvin Goodman)

    A COVER-UP at 9/11 is directly responsible for phony "war on terror" abroad and the destruction of human rights at home.

    False 9/11 and a Crypto-Fascist "war on terror" state are one and the same. We also know that a COVER-UP at 9/11 is naked proof of democracy MIA in America and around the globe.

    Similarly, it is safe to assume some degree of guilt or complicity on the part of anyone who lies about an event, or tries to hide, plant, or destroy any type of evidence. Indeed, the official story - 19 hijackers conspire with a sickly man in a cave to take over 4 planes and crash them into 3 buildings and a field when none of them could even fly a Cessna - is a conspiracy theory.

    Theories arise from evidence which gradually emerges. After the government releases an explanation of a particular event, a theory is only born because evidence exists to disprove their explanation, or at least call it into question. There's nothing insane about it, unless you define sanity as believing whatever the government tells you. In light of the fact that our government lies to us regularly, I would define believing everything they tell you as utter stupidity.

    The real question is not why people theorize about conspiracies, but why people choose to believe the government's version of events when it's obvious that they're lying. One reason is that most people never see the evidence because our "news" industry hides it, and another reason is that the same news industry will quickly associate anyone who questions the government with the people who see Elvis, Bigfoot, and UFO's.

    But sadly, I think the main reason people choose to believe the government's version of events despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, is because it's easier, and safer. If you ignore most of the evidence, and accept as plausible whatever ridiculous explanation the T.V. provides, your life remains simple, and you get to sit on your butt and watch more T.V. If on the other hand, you just look at the preponderance of evidence contradicting the 'official story' and realize you've been lied to, as a citizen in a democratic society, you're instantly burdened with being responsible for doing something about it.

    Every citizen of the United States has a civic duty to participate in their government, and keep themselves informed of its actions, or government "of the people, by the people and for the people" isn't possible. You were warned that "eternal vigilance is the price of freedom," but you chose to ignore your government, and believe whatever they told you, and because of this, Americans have lost their freedoms. Although presidents and senators are public servants, unlike the dog catcher and mailman, they wield a lot of power over people's lives, and that's why they have to be watched, and scrutinized.

    Fire Engineering magazine is the 125-year-old paper-of-record of the fire engineering community. Bill Manning, editor-in-chief, wrote an Editor’s Opinion in the January, 2002 edition. His editorial, $elling Out the Investigation, pointed out that destruction of evidence – the hurried removal of rubble which should be examined by investigators – is illegal. He also issued a “call to action”. To quote excerpts:

    "For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial evidence that could answer many questions … is on the slow boat to China …"

    "I have combed through our national standard for fire investigation, NFPA 921, but nowhere in it does one find an exemption allowing the destruction of evidence for buildings over 10 stories tall."

    "Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the ‘official investigation’ blessed by FEMA [Federal Emergency Management Agency] and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a "half baked farce" [emphasis mine] that may have already been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure. Except for the marginal benefit obtained from a three-day, visual walk-through of evidence sites conducted by ASCE investigation committee members – described by one close source as a ‘tourist trip’ – no one’s checking evidence for anything."

    "The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately."

    "Firefighters, this is your call to action. …contact your representatives in Congress and officials in Washington and help us correct this problem immediately."

    A brief summary of some outstanding and unanswered points of fact surrounding the WTC collapses.
    • The engineers who designed the building designed it to withstand impact by planes and fire. To be able to take multiple impacts from similarly sized aircraft as the 767--Like a window screen being poked with a pencil, it would do nothing to the integrity of the structure.
    • Never before in history has a steel framed skyscraper been brought down from fire, yet on 9/11, by coincidence, three such buildings collapsed in under ten seconds each.
    • Building 7, which was not structurally damaged by aircraft, came down in a manner that matches the signature demolition model, complete with triggering squibs (outward explosions of support structures preceding the falling mass), and falling into its footprint. Slow motion video footage highlights these features.
    • Larry Silverstein, the owner of the WTC complex, admitted on a September 2002 PBS documentary, "America Rebuilds" that he and the NYFD decided to 'pull' WTC 7 on the day of the attack. The word 'pull' is industry jargon for taking a building down with explosives. Larry Silverstein, WTC 7, and the 9/11 Demolition
    • Explosions and warnings to get back from WTC 7, "it is about to come down." WTC7 - Incriminating evidence Listen, five seconds in, you can clearly hear the BOMBS going off. "Did you hear that?", "Keep your eye on that building, that things coming down ....", "The building about to blow up ... move it back", "Alright guys .. ", "Move it back because the building is about to blow up ...", Firefighters: Explosion, Fireman: Bomb In The Building, We think there is going to be another explosion, Fireman: Boom, boom, boom
    • How did the 9/11 Commission Official Report deal with the WTC7 collapse? They omitted it entirely. Not one mention of it.
    • Towers 1 and 2 also fell in a manner consistent with demolition, and had numerous visible squibs preceding the falling mass. Bear in mind that a "tidy" and "safe" fall would not necessarily be the objective of individuals pulling off such a thing.
    • Rate of speed of the fall is near that of free-fall, which contradicts the pancake model in which a delay must be expected due to conservation of momentum – one of the foundational Laws of Physics.
    • The fine powder into which the building was converted during the collapse is consistent with the demolition model and its associated explosives. There would have been some pulverization in the pancake model, but not to the extent seen in this case.
    • Molten steel in the wreckage, weeks after the collapse, is consistent with military-grade demolition charges, in which chemicals continue to react with the metal long after the initial implosion event. Molten Steel at WTC site weeks later, Thermite & The Case for Controlled Demolition
    • NIST report 10/19/04: suggest that the steel was probably exposed to temperatures of only about 500F (250C), which is what one might expect from a thermodynamic analysis of the situation. "most perimeter panels (157 of 160) saw no temperature above 250C". To soften steel for the purposes of forging, normally temperatures need to be above 1100C. Newer NIST report contradicts original findings. Google search: "saw no temperature above 250c" nist
    • Numerous eyewitnesses described hearing multiple explosions and popping not associated with the planes hitting the buildings.
    • WTC buildings 1,2 and 7 had undergone unannounced security evacuations in the days prior to Sept. 11. A concurrent power outage disabled security cameras. Explosives-sniffing dogs were called off as part of that evacuation procedure. Marvin Bush, brother to the President, was a principal in a security company, Securacom and now named Stratesec, for the WTC center, Dulles International Airport and United Airlines
    • It would only take 10 men ten trips to place the necessary explosives to bring the towers down by demolition.
    • The 911 Commission report says that there were no central support columns, which is a lie. The WTC had the most robust central support columns, 47 massive steel columns, in the world at the time it was built, and was designed to be centrally supported.
    • Virtually all of the steel was quickly sold to scrap dealers, trucked away, and sent to Asia to be melted down. Thus the evidence was destroyed which could have shown whether explosives had been used to slice them, contrary to laws governing removal of items from a crime scene..
    • The towers were basically condemned in 1989 because of Galvanic Corrosion between the outer wall parts having aluminum in them and not electrically insulated properly when built. The cost then to bring them down was $5.6 Billion dollars. Deposition on the problem, Google search: galvanic corrosion wtc 1989 It is only corrosion on the aluminum panels on the exterior of the building. It had nothing to do with any support of the buildings only the fascia of them. The buildings were primarily supported by the 47 central columns. They took those columns out in just a very few places and with the support gone the outer walls were crushed thus throwing them outwards in 30 and 60 foot chucks. If the outer walls gave way then just that part would have fallen leaving all the rest standing.
    • Mark Bingham, a passenger on Flight 93, is supposed to have called his mother and said, 'Hi, Mom, this is Mark Bingham!' His mother confirmed it was his voice, but does anyone seriously believe that Mark Bingham would have used his last name in identifying himself to his mother? See When Seeing and Hearing Isn't Believing - Voice morphing technology
    • The Northwoods Document irrefutably establishes our government WOULD openly conspire to not only provoke and allow an attack (to further an already established military agenda) ...they'd actually manufacture the entire event.
    • Video of Norman Mineta stating before the 911 commission about Cheney in the bunker giving orders--stand down..
    • There are over 80 Senior Military, Intelligence, and Government Critics of the 9/11 Commission Report and the official story. Additionally there are over 110 Scholars listed also.
    • 911 And American Empire - Intellectuals Speak Out - 2:05 streaming

    The WTC Towers:

    How could those towers have collapsed into a pile of rubble only a few stories high, when the core of each tower consisted of 47 massive steel central columns? You've got these 47 columns that go from the sub basements to the top. How could those all have just collapsed into a pile of rubble?

    The 9/11 Commission settled that easily. They said the core of each building consisted of a hollow steel shaft that just had elevators and stairwells in it. That was easy . . . for them. No real explanation there because they could not explain it.

    The columns were 36" x 16" and were 4" thick certified construction grade steel, tapering in thickness to 1/4", and not size, toward the top. They were fitted in 5" thick bases, 54" x 22", going deep and firmly into the bedrock. So you have 1100 feet of Steel which is a good conductor of heat. That means that if you heat a part, say 40' out of 1100', then the heat would conduct or wick into the cooler part and cool off the heated area to an extent while the lower and thicker part would remain much cooler.

    Now I said it was a good conductor and not a great conductor, you know this because the handle of your iron skillet does not get anywhere near as hot as the pan. You can test this further by tieing or welding 2 skillets together by their handles then heat one on the stove for an hour and note that the other is just warm.

    Add to this the fact that the lower half of the 47 columns contained 4 times the mass of the upper half, because of the tapering. This means that the vast majority of the lower half would remain cool to the touch thus leaving 550 feet of columns with nearly 100% of engineered strength.

    Now we all know that the towers started collapsing from the upper part of the upper half and that they were in essence disintegrating as they came down, throwing off the debris to the sides. And we know that the lower half had to support itself and the upper half so by the time it got half way down there was this massively strong lower half with just over half the mass of the building to support. Essentially, at that point, the lower half was only supporting half what it was 5 seconds before.

    Theoretically it should have stopped collapsing at that point. This is the only logical result that should have happened. At a very minimum you would be left with 47 columns sticking up in the air over 500 feet after all else crashes down. What actually happened is beyond physical reality and is totally absurd.

    So how do we explain the complete collapse? Actually we do not have to, it is their story that does not make sense. They have not been able to explain this without changing their official story several times yet there is still no practical nor logical explanation coming from them. Indeed there is no possible reason other than controlled demolition.

    WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 are the only steel-structure buildings ever to have collapsed (allegedly) as a result of fire. There are several cases of fires in other such buildings, none of which collapsed.

    A Fema report does indeed point out some extreme anomalies about melted and corroded steel beams containing sulphur and other mixtures as follows. Yet NIST does not even cover this fact, they have stated that "most perimeter panels (157 of 160) saw no temperature above 250C." It is clear that Nist and Fema do not agree with each other with their opposing views. This is expounded upon by Steven E. Jones, Ph.D. who notes that there must have been Thermite used to cause this and the subsequent collapse. Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? PDF - Steven E. Jones, Ph.D.

    "The temperature of the fire at the WTC was not unusual, and it was most definitely not capable of melting steel." -- Prof. Eagar, MIT, 2001

    "Your gut reaction would be the jet fuel is what made the fire so very intense, a lot of people figured that's what melted the [WTC] steel. Indeed it did not, the steel did not melt." -- Dr. Gayle, NIST, 2005

    The photo at the right was taken 6 weeks after 9/11. How is this explained when MIT and NIST says it did not happen..

    Molten Metal Flows at Ground Zero, Molten Metal WTC Thermite, Physics Prof. Steven Jones: Thermate Demolition Evidence, Red hot molten metal in the ground 5 weeks after 9/11, Molten Steel at WTC 1,2,7. HOW?, Molten Steel Example footage, Physics Prof. Steven Jones Shows Video Evidence of Thermite, 9/11 Truth: FEMA & NIST's "Pancake Theory" is a Lie, The True Lies of 9/11 (Part 1), Part 2.

    FEMA Report: Evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting, was readily visible in the nearsurface microstructure." ... "The thinning of the steel occurred by high temperature corrosion due to a combination of oxidation and sulfidation." ... "The unusual thinning of the member is most likely due to an attack of the steel by grain boundary penetration of sulfur forming sulfides that contain both iron and copper." ... "A liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel." ... "The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified. The rate of corrosion is also unknown. It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings. It is also possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure. A detailed study into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed to determine what risk, if any, is presented to existing steel structures exposed to severe and long-burning fires."

    The woman in the hole shows that the towers were Not an Inferno. The NIST report states that the Jet fuel was burned off after 10 minutes. Thw firefighter audio tapes show that in one of the towers there were "only scattered pockets of fire and could be knocked down with 2 hoses." Indeed they should not have come down which leads us back to Controlled Demolition on the Central Columns. See also Final Report on the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers National Institute of Standards and Technology,

    "No Steel was recovered from WTC 7" 'DRAFT' Executive Summary of NCSTAR 1-3...

    9-11 Commission Report; NOTES; Chapter 9 Heroism and Horror; Note 1, Dirk Gerhardt

    "At least six air traffic controllers who dealt with two of the hijacked airliners on Sept. 11, 2001, made a tape recording that same day describing the events, but the tape was destroyed by a supervisor without anyone making a transcript or even listening to it, the Transportation Department said in a report today.",¬Found=true

Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the "official investigation" blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a "half-baked farce" that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure. Structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial evidence that could answer many questions... The destruction and removal of evidence must stop immediately. Fire Engineering - 1/4/2002

"the president has said only a minority of the Commission can see a minority of the documents, and then they have to clear what they are going to say to the rest of the Commission with the White House." According to a 2004 Democracy Now interview, after the White House set the conditions for the examination of documents, Cleland said, "If this decision stands, I, as a member of the commission, cannot look any American in the eye, especially family members of victims, and say the commission had full access. This investigation is now compromised." In the Press for Truth documentary, Cleland summarized his opinion, stating, "It's a scam."
-- Senator Max Cleland

WTC Building 7:

"That building is never coming down, that didn't get hit by a plane, why isn't somebody in there putting the fire out?" Comment by a firefighter, September 11, 2001.
The Long Awaited NIST WTC 7 Final Report Finally Released on 8-21-08
Q and A about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation - BASED on NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth! - Real Experts

FOX-5 Reports 9/11/01: WTC-7 Collapsed Before Actual Event
WTC7 The Smoking Gun of 9/11 - part 1
WTC7 The Smoking Gun of 9/11 - part 2
WTC7 The Smoking Gun of 9/11 - Google Video search

WTC 7 was the third major building that went down that day has not even been explained yet. Actually it was, unsatisfactorily and they had to revise it when some glaring omissions were pointed out. Now they do not even have a final report on it because obviously they know they don't have a plausible story to tell. It is due in 2007 some time.... We'll see..

UPDATE: 8-21-2008 - NIST Finally releases the WTC 7 Final Report

They have completely reversed their stance on both "Diesel fuel fires" and "Falling debris scooped out 25% of the building" caused the collapse. Now it is a completely new and unknown phenomenon that there was Thermal expansion from fires on floor 12 caused the beams on the east side of the building to push the girder to the west, breaking its connection to column 79 and pushing it off its seat on that column. This then allowed that floor, on that side and area to fall, causing the lower floors to fall which then left column 79 not laterally supported so then it failed and caused a progressive collapse of the entire building.

This "final report" took 5 years, was extended 3 years, $20 Million dollars and thousands of hours of 'scientist' labor to fake.

To be continued...

FEMA's recent excuse (prior to 8-21-2008): "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse [“official theory”] remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis [fire/damage-caused collapse] has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue."

FEMA is not an investigative agency, but it was entrusted with the sole responsibility for investigating the collapses. It began to coordinate the destruction of the evidence almost immediately. The structural steel was quickly removed and loaded on ships for transport to blast furnaces in India and China.

WTC 7 was not hit by a plane that day so there is no "plane knocked the fireproofing off" excuse. As a matter of fact, it is the only steel framed building to be brought down by fire alone in the history of the world. And so it's obviously the biggest embarrassment for the government, so the 9/11 Commission handled Building 7 by simply omitting it from the report.

The 47-story, WTC-7 burst into flame, several suspicious, small haphazard fires that raged hours through several key floors long after the twin towers fell. They should have been extinguished in minutes by the buildings fire system. Besides government agencies DOD, CIA, SS, IRS and Giuliani's "Command HQ," it also was home to the Security and Exchange Commission. Several of the floors housed records pertaining to multi-billion dollar investigations. The Los Angeles Times reported on September 17, 2001 that an estimated 3,000 to 4,000 cases were destroyed including those for Worldcom and Enron, the latter of which swindled California out of $70 Billion Dollars in a power shortage scam.

They included SEC's major inquiry into the manner in which investment banks divided up hot shares of initial public offerings (IPOs) during the high-tech boom of the late 90's. Remember this important fact: By end of summer 2001 was when all Hell was breaking loose at Enron, the bulk of all Enron's documents filed with the SEC likely went up in smoke when that building was deliberately blown. By destroying the building, the fire and subsequent collapse destroyed the records forever and meant a huge net savings for CEOs and corporations being investigated.

How Did They Know Building 7 Was Going to Collapse? 42 Eyewitnesses to it preplanned destruction.

WTC7 - Incriminating evidence, Stand back, It is about to come down - video - Video from CNN clearly shows firefighters and police telling the public to get back because Building 7 was about to come down and in the words of the cameraman was about to "blow up."

A cursory insight into professional building demolition tells us that experts are required to spend weeks and months planning the demolition of any building, ensuring that the explosives are placed in exactly the right spots, that the collapse will not impact surrounding buildings, and that a myriad of sufficient safety procedures are followed.

To imagine that demolition experts could rig such a huge building amidst the chaos of the day, unsure of whether further attacks were coming, in a matter of hours and bring the building down neatly in its own footprint without afflicting major damage to adjacent buildings is beyond belief.

Even if one entertains the notion that this is within the realm of possibility, the fact is that the federal government, FEMA and NIST and Silverstein Properties are all knowingly lying in claiming that the building collapsed by accident as a result of burning debris from the twin towers.

Now it is established that they lied about Building 7, how can we trust their often changing explanations of the collapse of the twin towers, especially considering the dozens and dozens of eyewitnesses who have gone on the record to report the fact that explosives were seen and heard on all levels of both towers, including underground?

We are being asked to put our faith in either the federal government, who deliberately lied about 9/11 in the very days after the attack in telling emergency workers and firemen that the toxic air was safe to breathe, or the emergency workers and other rescue heroes who risked their lives and are still suffering the consequences of their actions.

This testimony demands an immediate grand jury inquiry into both monolithic insurance fraud, potential manslaughter, and a complete re-appraisal and re-investigation into everything else that happened on 9/11 in an effort to discover what else the government lied about concerning the events of that day and its aftermath.

NYPD Officer Heard Building 7 Bombs - "The whole time you're hearing boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. I think I know an explosion when I hear it"

It is important to stress that everywhere we turn there are statements from firemen, NYPD officials, EMT's and others who were involved in the rescue efforts attesting to the fact that Building 7 was brought down deliberately and that bombs were heard in all three buildings. During the five year anniversary protests at ground zero, a plethora of firemen and police echoed similar sentiments but few are prepared to go on the record. However, the fact that they and many of their friends are now dying in large numbers as a result of government deception is encouraging more to come forward.

Mueller admitted on CNN on September 20 and 27 that the FBI had no proof of the identities of the men actually on board the airplanes. 9-11 perpetrators were using skillfully made fake IDs with identities stolen from Arab men?

In an April 19 speech delivered to the Common wealth Club in San Francisco, Mueller said that the purported hijackers, in his words, “left no paper trial.” The FBI director stated flatly, "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper—either here in the United States or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere—that mentioned any aspect of the Sept. 11 plot." In describing Mueller’s evidence fiasco, Los Angeles Times reporters Erich Lichtblau and Josh Meyer, whose article was reprinted in The Washington Post on April 30, note that: Law enforcement officials say that while they have been able to reconstruct the movements of the hijackers before the attacks—all legal except for a few speeding tickets—they have found no evidence of their actual plotting. In process. . . As if the above is not enough to put all the perps in prison..

The Pentagon:

Click image for the High-Res original.

It is recommended that everyone save this to your system. I believe this image is a smoking gun and is disappearing from the net. It was saved from the fema web site in the days just after 911. The photograph was taken prior to the collapse of that section of the Pentagon which happened at about 20 - 35 minutes after impact.

Not a one of the web sites or 'media' orgs that support the official story of flight 77 will ever show you this image, rather they only show the image after that section collapsed. The talking heads keep repeating that it was a 90 foot hole or as in the latest Times 'hit piece' or here -- that it was a 75 foot hole that was left by the plane! Do you see a 75/90' hole? This is their fallacy where you can see that they are lying. In "The path to 9/11" by ABC the very first image of the Pentagon was one of after it collapsed. This is a case of deliberate deception by the main stream media. Can you say COVERUP? In the video The Debate: Loose Change Vs. Popular Mechanics David Dunbar speaking for popular mechinics states that the above image is "a misleading picture, that gash is about 90 feet across" at 24:30 into the debate. Cold War veteran, Maj. General Albert Stubblebine, refutes Pentagon's official story of "passenger plane" striking the Pentagon on September 11th 2001.
Pilots for 9/11 Truth - American 77 (Pentagon) @

What they will always show you is an image similar to that at the right. The section that collapsed is roughly 65' across. The windows are supposedly 5' wide by 7' tall, measuring this out in photoshop shows the entry hole to be roughly 16' wide. The 757 has a wingspan of 124 feet and tail height of 44 feet with a takeoff weight of 100 tons. Plane specs at, jet photos here. How did a 757 fit through that? It is just large enough for the main body but above it there is no damage where the tail would have hit and to the sides there appears to be too little damage where the wings and engines would have hit if it were a 757. The wings were roughly 25-30 tons each and moving at the estimated 400+ to 540 mph would make for a very large amount of kinetic energy. There would have been 2 engines, 9' in diameter and weighing 10,000 lbs each but they only found 1 turbo fan impeller which was about 2-3' in diameter.

The facade of the Pentagon is made of limestone which is very soft and brittle, it would be easily crushed against the concrete behind it and fall to the ground as seen to the right of the hole. Notice the facade is mostly still intact. Notice the windows above and the one at the left of the hole are still intact with foam on them. That window at the left side of the hole must be one of them "Penta-Glass" windows. It surely should not be there just hanging like that.

Where the wings attach to the main body of the plane it is highly reinforced and is called the "wing root". It is extremely strong and many times stronger than just the ability to hold the wings and heavy weight of the engines at standstill or the weight of the plane in flight. It must be able to hold up under any expected turbulance encountered. There is also the leverage factor here wherein the wings are about 56' long each giving a center of gravity of about 18' and the thickness of the wing is 4.38', at its thickest, so it would have a factor of about 4.11. This means that the wing root must be another 4 times stronger. It is a sure thing that the window to the left would not even be close to surviving if a 757 struck. Photo of window and frame assembly. Transcript on 9-15-01 of damage tour. Briefing slides of damage.

According to the Dept. of Defence, the wings "telescoped" into the body of the aircraft and followed it in. The wings of a 757 are swept back at an angle of 29 degrees. With the angle of entry, 48-50 degrees, and if it were a 757 and there were sufficient column reinforcement in the building then the left wing would have sheared off and mostly traveled down the side of the building. It is simple physics and common sense. The wing on the left could not possibly have "followed the plane into the building" even if it were made of rubber, the 'moment of inertia' vs the 'elasticity' of the materials the wing is composed of is just too high at the point of the wing-root. Conversely, if the columns were weak then there would be a much larger hole similar to what was left in the WTC buildings. The wing on the right is a different story, it would have started folding in as the tip hit the building. Additionally when the right wing hit the building that would have applied an angular momentum to the entire plane, causing it to enter in a sliding/sideways motion possibly enough to cause a shearing off of the rear half of the main body section. This is all assuming that the column on the left side of the hole was "infinitely" strong, which it is not. In any case the damage to the fragile limestone facade would have been much more extensive and there would be 30,000+ pounds of left wing material outside the pentagon, which there was not.

The area of the Pentagon that was hit, housed the "Office of Naval Intelligence" which had many on going investigations into things such as the JFK assassination and particularly monetary malfeasance or waste of taxpayer dollars at the Pentagon. Just the day before on September 10, 2001 Donald Rumsfeld was speaking to Congress about a "Missing $2.3 Trillion Dollars" that cannot be accounted for. The actual amount is over $3.4 Trillion, see Rep. Cynthia McKinney confront Rumsfeld about it in the House Armed Services Committee. Cynthia Mckinney Grills Rumsfeld over missing Pentagon Trillions, Dyncorp Sex Slave Trade and War Games on 9/11 - CSPAN. Many more Trillions missing articles. It would have been "handy" to stomp out that investigation by literally destroying it. Following Zakheim and Pentagon trillions to Israel and 9-11

After the Pentagon attack, the video cameras and tapes at a nearby CITGO, the Sheraton Hotel along I-395 and Virginia DOT cameras were all confiscated by the FBI and they have yet to disclose any of the contents that were recorded by those cameras. I have read about dozens of traffic camera videos. What about those 5 frames from the guard camera, where are the rest of the frames? Walmart has dozens of cameras on their buildings, the Pentagon would have at least that many, where are those? Why would they not release all the videos and prove this pentagon thing once and for all?

It is now confirmed that there were 86 cameras total covering the Pentagon, including the 2 videos that were just recently released. The government claims all remaining 84 cameras either didn't capture the impact or that tape in the cameras was mysteriously empty and yet returned as normal to film the cleanup operations. If the government is telling the truth in saying that the tapes show nothing of interest then what are they trying to hide by not releasing them? Our Analysis of the new release of the Pentagon videos.

Those cameras would have recorded what came in to hit the Pentagon and if viewed by the public, all the world would know that it was not a Boeing 757, American Airlines Flight 77, as we were told. All the world would know that Bush's assertion is in fact a huge lie.

The Pentagon is the world's best defended site, within a couple miles of Andrews Air Force Base. The military claims there were no fighter squadrons on alert, which Griffin says is ridiculous.

The United States military boasts of the best radar system anywhere — they claim they don't miss anything in North American airspace, and the system is designed to track multiple targets simultaneously (as it would need to if America were under attack from a foreign air force or ICBM missile attack). So how'd they miss a commercial airliner headed right for the Pentagon?

The Pentagon is equipped with antiaircraft missile batteries that attacks anything within range that's not equipped with a US military transponder. Which means either the missile batteries were deactivated on 9/11 or so called 'Flight 77' had a US military transponder. Neither of which is a promising explanation.

Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Two - Flight Of American 77
Pilots for 9/11 Truth
NTSB Flight Path Study of American Airlines Flight 77 pdf

What I see so clearly is that with all the lies the gov has made in the past 5 years just how can anything from them, be believed including and especially the Pentagon story.

"It can be held certain that information that is withheld or suppressed contains truths that are detrimental to the persons involved in the suppression."
-- J. Edgar Hoover

The Pentagon claims The Engines, Wings and Flight Recorder were Vaporized... They also claim The Passenger Body Parts were not Vaporized, and were Identified! Furthermore Autopsies Show There Were No Arabs On Flight 77 and here.
They Claim that the nose punched through 6 Reinforced walls - 9 feet of Concrete but the heavier and denser 10,000 lb. engines didn't punch through even one. The recent Popular Mechanics story changes this to claim that it was the landing gear that punched through the 6 walls. Does that make sense?

Find many more videos/documentaries and books, many online.

CNN Quick Vote

Now That You Know the Truth, Here is What Can You Do

Exercise your Constitutional rights by signing the petition to require the immediate release of the entire report completed by the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General (DOJ-IG) of its investigation into confirmed reports by FBI Whistle blower Sibel Edmonds on the cover-up of information and leads pre and post 9/11...
The Appeal to Release the DOJ-IG Report on the 9/11 Cover-Up
Petition for Release of Classified DOJ-IG Report on FBI Cover-Up
Petition to the Senate to Investigate Oddities Involving 9/11 Terrorist Attacks
Petition - Support a resolution calling for a 9/11 special prosecutor

911 Exposed

Note: You may need "Codecs" installed into your computer to view downloaded videos. They can be obtained through Codecs with links and instructions.

"In America, the criminally insane rule and the rest of us,
 or the vast majority of the rest of us, either do not care,
 do not know, or are distracted and properly brainwashed 
 into acquiescence."
 -- Kurt Nimmo

"The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed
 than he who reads them; inasmuch as he who knows nothing is
 nearer to truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods
 and errors."
 -- Thomas Jefferson 

"There is a chance for the President of the United States to use
 the disaster . . . to carry out what his father - a phrase his
 father used I think only once, and it hasn't been used since
 - and that is a New World Order."
 -- Gary Hart, at a CFR meeting September 14, 2001

COPYRIGHT © 1998 - 2020 - - All Rights Reserved
Last modified: Thursday, 24-Sep-2020 19:52:13 PDT